Landlords Voice Concerns Over £25,000 PRS Ombudsman Compensation Cap
UK Property News

Landlords Voice Concerns Over £25,000 PRS Ombudsman Compensation Cap

By Jordan Hale, Senior Lettings Editor · 13 July 2026 · 2 min read

Editor's note: This brief was summarised by The Property AI Newsroom from a report by Property118. Read the original article for full details.

Landlords Raise Alarm Over PRS Ombudsman Compensation Proposals

Landlords have expressed concern following suggestions that tenants could be awarded up to £25,000 through the new Private Rented Sector (PRS) Ombudsman scheme. The proposal has sparked debate within the sector, with some landlords warning that it could signal a shift towards a compensation culture in the private rented sector.

According to a report by Property118, the potential size of the ombudsman award has caused particular unease among landlords. The government has stated that the PRS Ombudsman is intended to provide a quick, fair, impartial, and binding route for resolving complaints. However, some landlords are worried about the direction of recent reforms and the increasing risk of financial claims.

During a House of Lords debate, it was suggested that the £25,000 cap was designed to align with other redress schemes. It was also noted that tenants who believe they deserve more could still pursue higher awards through the courts. This combination has led to concerns that the ombudsman award could be seen as a starting point for further claims.

Landlords have also highlighted the impact of recent changes, including new duties, fines, compliance deadlines, and penalties. For example, letting or advertising a property without registering it on the new PRS database could result in a civil penalty of up to £7,000, while providing fraudulent information could lead to a fine of up to £40,000.

Some landlords have questioned how the compensation figures are determined and expressed doubts about their ability to absorb such costs. One landlord reported deciding to keep several rental properties empty rather than risk exposure to the new regime. Others have called for mechanisms to address serious tenant misconduct and damage, arguing that the current system places the burden of compliance and financial risk primarily on landlords.

The report notes that while the ombudsman is intended to resolve disputes fairly, there is concern among landlords that reforms may assume landlords are at fault and have the resources to cover large awards.


Source: Property118
About the author
Jordan Hale
Senior Lettings Editor

Jordan Hale leads The Property AI's lettings coverage with a focus on UK rental legislation, agent compliance, and the day-to-day pressures facing letting agents. Articles bylined Jordan Hale combine current trade reporting with practical guidance for letting agents and inventory…

Specialises in: Renters' Rights Act, EPC regulations, tenancy deposit schemes, agent licensing, Right to Rent compliance.

Streamline Your Property Management

See how The Property AI helps landlords and letting agents create inventory reports and grow their business.

Book a Free Demo